Issue: What is Enlightenment?
Thanks for asking the issues that can come to your mind, even though they seem "fairly peculiar" to you. In Enlightenment all observed suffering has faded, for what but wrong-mindedness seemed to make the misperception called pain.
Suffering was the dream that Christ can leave a Warm Creator's Mind. "If suffering is real there is number God. If God is actual acim app there's no pain."(W-190.3) The latter is true because Lord has no opposite. Enlightenment entails no suffering or displeasure about ANYTHING, for Enlightenment is Genuine, Regular Happiness, Peace, Freedom, and Joy. Being Continuous, Enlightenment knows maybe not of change. The impression of weakness and changing emotions moved as well. There's number ego to fall "right back into." Soul Abides in delicate Love. All suffering is over Now and nothing stays but a benefit of Stillness.
The Holy Nature may be the note that Life is Eternal. The Present Moment could be the gate way to Eternity. The planet of photographs was an environment of illusion. Pictures are thus simple to the Holy Spirit. They certainly were "neutralized" the immediate they did actually arise.
What does that mean in terms of your next problem? You cannot eliminate what's never lived, and in the Sacred Spirit's Perspective of forgiveness damage is impossible. Figures were never born and never die because the entire world of photos could be the past. It is impossible to get origins and endings in a script that's already written and over long ago. There's number life in images. Here is the meaning of "Hold number graven images prior to the Lord Thy God." All photographs were designed to obscure the Reality from awareness, and they can only be understood as you illusion. If illusions could possibly be divided up into living and dead, natural and inorganic, animate and inanimate Enlightenment would be impossible. For what's Enlightenment but Natural Oneness, much beyond the chance of department of all kinds? The split mind was the illusion. Seek not to challenge the split brain to types and contact some forms alive and some forms dead. God understands perhaps not form. The split brain was the "killer" dream, yet the Sacred Heart reminds the asleep mind that what is full and single cannot BE split. In Heaven Mind is One Spirit, and even pertaining to that earth forgiveness shows this Oneness. The forgiven world understands the unity of the relieved brain and sees that there is nothing "outside" of the single mind which dreams lightly a pleased, light dream. The goal of ACIM would be to dream lightly of a sinless world. This goal is a lot more than probable, it's expected!
In terms of my seeming diet, "consume what's served" is the Guidance I was given from the Sacred Nature many years ago. Join along with your brother and allow number idea come involving the Love you share. This Guidance has not changed. "Dinner" is always a background for sharing the Joy of the Living Moment. What the planet calls "breathing" and "eating" and "drinking" and "sleeping" are actually yet in the Enlightened State. The Relieved Perspective sees the sameness of things since each of them reveal the same Purpose: forgiveness. That Perception isn't "personal," for in good belief nothing is personal. Lord is not any respecter of persons. I virtually can't "take" an animal's "life" since Living is Spirit and can just only be extensive or Provided as God Gives. "Take" has no indicating in my own mind and because creatures have not "lived" it is impossible that they could "die." The opinion expressed in the idea "individually take an animal's life" has several main assumptions that are false. In right-mindedness it's obvious that ideas are strengthened as they are given away or discussed, and "taking" a "life" or anything at all does not have any meaning. All that I give is directed at mySelf, and in offering there's no reduction, no sacrifice, and nothing is actually taken away from wholeness and unity. The instructor of God does not want whatever cannot be given away. Such is the Joy of wonders! The idea seeds be seemingly flung everywhere, yet there's never a good glance back to see where in fact the seeds land. The vegetables are never for an "other," and because providing and getting are exactly the same your head gets the gifts it gives. This really is really the party you find for within the ego's questions.
The sole question that need be asked is really a issue that's not really foolish at all: Am I prepared to know that God's Can and My Own would be the Same? God's Will for Me is for Ideal Happiness. And what but that May is the Can of Christ? Joyfully, nothing can change Timeless Love. Thank You Lord!
Thanks for asking the issues that can come to your mind, even though they seem "fairly peculiar" to you. In Enlightenment all observed suffering has faded, for what but wrong-mindedness seemed to make the misperception called pain.
Suffering was the dream that Christ can leave a Warm Creator's Mind. "If suffering is real there is number God. If God is actual acim app there's no pain."(W-190.3) The latter is true because Lord has no opposite. Enlightenment entails no suffering or displeasure about ANYTHING, for Enlightenment is Genuine, Regular Happiness, Peace, Freedom, and Joy. Being Continuous, Enlightenment knows maybe not of change. The impression of weakness and changing emotions moved as well. There's number ego to fall "right back into." Soul Abides in delicate Love. All suffering is over Now and nothing stays but a benefit of Stillness.
The Holy Nature may be the note that Life is Eternal. The Present Moment could be the gate way to Eternity. The planet of photographs was an environment of illusion. Pictures are thus simple to the Holy Spirit. They certainly were "neutralized" the immediate they did actually arise.
What does that mean in terms of your next problem? You cannot eliminate what's never lived, and in the Sacred Spirit's Perspective of forgiveness damage is impossible. Figures were never born and never die because the entire world of photos could be the past. It is impossible to get origins and endings in a script that's already written and over long ago. There's number life in images. Here is the meaning of "Hold number graven images prior to the Lord Thy God." All photographs were designed to obscure the Reality from awareness, and they can only be understood as you illusion. If illusions could possibly be divided up into living and dead, natural and inorganic, animate and inanimate Enlightenment would be impossible. For what's Enlightenment but Natural Oneness, much beyond the chance of department of all kinds? The split mind was the illusion. Seek not to challenge the split brain to types and contact some forms alive and some forms dead. God understands perhaps not form. The split brain was the "killer" dream, yet the Sacred Heart reminds the asleep mind that what is full and single cannot BE split. In Heaven Mind is One Spirit, and even pertaining to that earth forgiveness shows this Oneness. The forgiven world understands the unity of the relieved brain and sees that there is nothing "outside" of the single mind which dreams lightly a pleased, light dream. The goal of ACIM would be to dream lightly of a sinless world. This goal is a lot more than probable, it's expected!
In terms of my seeming diet, "consume what's served" is the Guidance I was given from the Sacred Nature many years ago. Join along with your brother and allow number idea come involving the Love you share. This Guidance has not changed. "Dinner" is always a background for sharing the Joy of the Living Moment. What the planet calls "breathing" and "eating" and "drinking" and "sleeping" are actually yet in the Enlightened State. The Relieved Perspective sees the sameness of things since each of them reveal the same Purpose: forgiveness. That Perception isn't "personal," for in good belief nothing is personal. Lord is not any respecter of persons. I virtually can't "take" an animal's "life" since Living is Spirit and can just only be extensive or Provided as God Gives. "Take" has no indicating in my own mind and because creatures have not "lived" it is impossible that they could "die." The opinion expressed in the idea "individually take an animal's life" has several main assumptions that are false. In right-mindedness it's obvious that ideas are strengthened as they are given away or discussed, and "taking" a "life" or anything at all does not have any meaning. All that I give is directed at mySelf, and in offering there's no reduction, no sacrifice, and nothing is actually taken away from wholeness and unity. The instructor of God does not want whatever cannot be given away. Such is the Joy of wonders! The idea seeds be seemingly flung everywhere, yet there's never a good glance back to see where in fact the seeds land. The vegetables are never for an "other," and because providing and getting are exactly the same your head gets the gifts it gives. This really is really the party you find for within the ego's questions.
The sole question that need be asked is really a issue that's not really foolish at all: Am I prepared to know that God's Can and My Own would be the Same? God's Will for Me is for Ideal Happiness. And what but that May is the Can of Christ? Joyfully, nothing can change Timeless Love. Thank You Lord!
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek