This is often realized in one easy, but probably controversial, choice--the only one--and which means first determining the problem: Also damned much immigration of also damned several Third Earth Muslims who'll never assimilate into Western culture no real matter what state they land in due to the vast, impassable abyss breaking up their native country's tradition and religion from that prevalent in France--and all Europe and the West for that matter.

Their selfish resolve never to assimilate--more properly, frequently their refusal to assimilate--is reason enough perhaps not to simply accept them in the very first place. Europe's gross ,immigration attorney software underestimation of the long-term harmful ramifications of unrestrained immigration of any form, and especially the preponderance of immigrants so in opposition to European tradition, faith, and prices found in our Western ideals of a democratic society, has evolved in a comparatively limited time into a clash of countries, one that may possibly not be gained by the Europeans.

Once they arrive in such substantial numbers as we're seeing in Europe, not only can they not absorb, they need those nations alternatively change to their life style, allow them their very own regulations and methods, give them livelihoods, training, and protection, and allow for their own families and distant family relations to participate them--referred to as "cycle migration." It is obviously this way and never vice versa.

While we're by no means compelled to simply accept the type of immigrants now deluging Europe, humanity does need we, the remaining portion of the earth, provide for their basic needs while they are in such a state as having fled their house country for protection from war. This could and must be done by establishing refugee ideologies as near with their house place that you can with the intent to repatriate them at some point. Issue solved. They are offered for; we are not overburdened.